ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the role of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) in the diagnosis of non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and its relationship with acid exposure.Methods:From March 2013 to May 2019, in First Hospital Affiliated to Jilin University, patients who underwent gastroendoscopy exam, esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM), 24-h pH monitoring and had gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, and without mucosal or structural abnormal changes under gastroendoscopy were retrospectively selected. Based on Rome Ⅳ criteria, the patients were reevaluated and the diagnostic types were NERD, reflux hypersensitivity (RH) and functional heartburn (FH). The changes of esophageal HRM metrics and acid reflux-related parameters of patients with IEM were analyzed and compared. Independent sample t-test, nonparametric test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Results:The data of 228 patients were collected. Thirty-seven cases with esophageal gastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction and severe esophageal motility disorder (8 cases of achalasia, 9 cases of EGJ outflow obstruction, 4 cases of distal esophageal spasm, 14 cases of absent contractility and 2 cases of hypercontractile esophagus) and fifty-three cases with endoscopic reflux esophagitis under endoscopy (20 cases of Los Angeles grade A, 15 cases of grade B, 13 cases of grade C, and 5 cases of grade D) were excluded. In the end 138 patients were enrolled, including 60 males and 78 females, with a mean age of (50.1±14.1) years, including 36 cases of NERD, 44 cases of RH and 58 cases of FH. According to esophageal HRM Chicago classification standard, 138 patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms were divided into IEM group (46 cases, including 15 cases of NERD, 12 cases of RH, and 19 cases of FH) and normal manometry group (92 cases, including 21 cases of NERD, 32 cases of RH, and 39 cases of FH). There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients diagnosed as NERD, RH and FH between the two groups ( P> 0.05). The length of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) (2.70 cm, 2.40 to 3.00 cm vs. 3.00 cm, 2.70 to 3.20 cm), the average value of LES resting breathing pressure (16.55 mmHg, 7.98 to 22.95 mmHg vs. 19.10 mmHg, 14.15 to 25.68 mmHg, 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), the distal contractile integral (DCI)(417.90 mmHg·s·cm, 279.08 to 584.45 mmHg·s·cm vs. 1 429.40 mmHg·s·cm , 994.38 to 1 852.80 mmHg·s·cm) and EGJ contractile integral (37.86 mmHg·cm, 26.97 to 46.78 mmHg·cm vs. 45.19 mmHg·cm, 35.39 to 58.20 mmHg·cm) of IEM group were all lower than those of normal manometry group, ( Z=3.33, 2.09, 8.09, and 2.90, all P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in LES resting pressure at the end of the breath, 4 s-intergrated reloxation pressure, distal latency, upper esophageal sphincter (UES) resting pressure (UESP), UES residual pressure, UES baseline relaxation time, UES recovery time, EGJ type, acid reflux related parameters (total acid exposure time (AET), AET in upright position, AET in supine position, and Demeester score) between the two groups (all P>0.05). The 36 NERD patients were divided into IEM group (15 cases) and normal manometry group (21 cases). The distal contractile integral was lower in IEM group than that in normal manometry group (401.10 mmHg·s·cm, 276.60 to 555.60 mmHg·s·cm vs. 1 135.00 mmHg·s·cm, 903.20 to 1 537.65 mmHg·s·cm), the difference was statistically significant ( Z=3.93, P<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in EGJ type, other HRM parameters or acid reflux-related parameters between IEM group and normal manometry group (all P>0.05). Conclusions:IEM is not related with the diagnosis of NERD. In patients with gastroscopy-negative gastroesophageal reflux symptoms or NERD with IEM, except for weakened peristaltic function, the EGJ morphological evaluation of the anti-reflux barrier function has nothing to do with IEM. In NERD patients, the relationship between IEM and acid exposure needs further study.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To evaluate esophageal motility and anti-reflux barrier function in patients with different phenotypes of heartburn and negative endoscopic findings based on the Rome Ⅳ criteria.@*Methods@#From March 2011 to November 2018, 136 patients with heartburn and negative endoscopic findings were retrospectively analyzed. The patients underwent high-resolution manometry (HRM), 24-hour pH monitoring and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) test and according to the Rome Ⅳ criteria and new diagnostic procedures, they were divided into non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) group, reflux hypersensitivity (RH) group, functional heartburn (FH) group and unclassified group. During the same period, 20 healthy volunteers were selected as healthy control group. The changes of esophageal motility and HRM were analyzed among different groups. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis H test and chi-square test.@*Results@#According to Rome Ⅳ criteria, 35 patients were enrolled into the NERD group, 43 patients were enrolled into the RH group, 48 patients were included in the FH group, and 10 patients were enrolled into unclassified group. There were no significant differences between the NERD group, the RH group, the FH group, the unclassified group and healthy control group in the length of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), end lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure (LESP), mean LESP, 4-second-integrated relaxation pressure (4 s-IRP), distal latency (DL) , upper esophageal sphincter residual pressure (UES-RP), upper esophageal sphincter relaxation time to nadir, upper esophageal sphincter (UES) recovery time and esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI, all P>0.05). The distal contractile integral (DCI) of NERD group and unclassified group were both lower than that of healthy control group (919.7 mmHg·s·cm (411.7, 1 417.9) mmHg·s·cm (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), 535.6 mmHg·s·cm (321.4, 1 513.4) mmHg·s·cm vs. 1 322.1 mmHg·s·cm (841.6, 1 918.5) mmHg·s·cm), and the differences were statistically significant (Z=-2.62 and -2.20, P=0.01 and 0.03). The upper esophageal sphincter pressure (UESP) of the unclassified group was lower than that of the healthy control group(57.0 mmHg (31.3, 77.8) mmHg vs. 70.4 mmHg (49.4, 97.8) mmHg), and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-2.64, P=0.02). There was significant difference in esophagogastric junction (EGJ) subtypes between the NERD group, the RH group, the FH group and the unclassified group (χ2=10.85, P=0.02); the proportion of type Ⅲ patients was highest in unclassified group, followed by NERD group, which were both higher than those of RH group and FH group. There was no significant difference in the proportion of esophageal motility subtypes between NERD group, RH group, FH group and unclassified group (P>0.05).@*Conclusions@#Patients with different phenotypes of heartburn and negative endoscopy finding should be classified by efficient diagnostic procedure according to the Rome Ⅳ criteria combined with HRM, 24-hour pH monitoring and PPI test. The unclassified patients need further evaluation, especially for those with effective PPI test and negative pH monitoring. However, the evaluation of anti-reflux barrier function by the HRM parameters in patients with heartburn and negative endoscopic findings has certain limitations.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate esophageal motility and anti-reflux barrier function in patients with different phenotypes of heartburn and negative endoscopic findings based on the Rome Ⅳ criteria.Methods From March 2011 to November 2018,136 patients with heartburn and negative endoscopic findings were retrospectively analyzed.The patients underwent high-resolution manometry (HRM),24-hour pH monitoring and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) test and according to the Rome Ⅳ criteria and new diagnostic procedures,they were divided into non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) group,reflux hypersensitivity (RH) group,functional heartburn (FH) group and unclassified group.During the same period,20 healthy volunteers were selected as healthy control group.The changes of esophageal motility and HRM were analyzed among different groups.Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance,Kruskal-Wallis H test and chi-square test.Results According to Rome Ⅳ criteria,35 patients were enrolled into the NERD group,43 patients were enrolled into the RH group,48 patients were included in the FH group,and 10 patients were enrolled into unclassified group.There were no significant differences between the NERD group,the RH group,the FH group,the unclassified group and healthy control group in the length of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES),end lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure (LESP),mean LESP,4-second-integrated relaxation pressure (4 s-IRP),distal latency (DL),upper esophageal sphincter residual pressure (UES-RP),upper esophageal sphincter relaxation time to nadir,upper esophageal sphincter (UES) recovery time and esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI,all P ＞0.05).The distal contractile integral (DCI) of NERD group and unclassified group were both lower than that of healthy control group (919.7 mmHg · s · cm (411.7,1 417.9) mmHg· s · cm (1 mmHg =0.133 kPa),535.6 mmHg · s · cm (321.4,1 513.4) mmHg · s · cm vs.1 322.1 mmHg · s · cm (841.6,1 918.5) mmHg · s · cm),and the differences were statistically significant (Z =-2.62 and-2.20,P =0.01 and 0.03).The upper esophageal sphincter pressure (UESP) of the unclassified group was lower than that of the healthy control group (57.0 mmHg (31.3,77.8) mmHg vs.70.4 mmHg (49.4,97.8) mmHg),and the difference was statistically significant (Z =-2.64,P =0.02).There was significant difference in esophagogastric junction (EGJ) subtypes between the NERD group,the RH group,the FH group and the unclassified group (x2 =10.85,P =0.02);the proportion of type Ⅲ patients was highest in unclassified group,followed by NERD group,which were both higher than those of RH group and FH group.There was no significant difference in the proportion of esophageal motility subtypes between NERD group,RH group,FH group and unclassified group (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions Patients with different phenotypes of heartburn and negative endoscopy finding should be classified by efficient diagnostic procedure according to the Rome Ⅳ criteria combined with HRM,24-hour pH monitoring and PPI test.The unclassified patients need further evaluation,especially for those with effective PPI test and negative pH monitoring.However,the evaluation of anti-reflux barrier function by the HRM parameters in patients with heartburn and negative endoscopic findings has certain limitations.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate therapeutic effects of Sini decoction (SND) on hypothyroidism based on serum meta-bonomics method .Methods Twenty-four rats were randomly divided into three groups including sham group ,surgery-induced hypothyroid model group and SND-treated group .The SND-treated group was given SND for 4 weeks .After 4 weeks ,the ser-um samples of each rat were collected and analyzed by UHPLC-Q-TOFMS ,pattern recognition analysis of metabolomics differ-ences among the groups and therapeutic effects of SND were evaluated .Results Total of 9 metabolites were identified through serum metabonomics analysis .It was showed that there was a possible mechanism that hypothyroidism was mainly involved in citrate cycle ,phenylalanine metabolism ,sphingolipid metabolism and phospholipid metabolism and the damage of hypothyroid-ism was reversed by SND .Conclusion SND administration could provide satisfactory effects on hypothyroidism through par-tially regulating the perturbed citrate cycle ,phenylalanine metabolism and phospholipid metabolism .